Stability of iris questioned

04/08/10

Iris patterns are generally thought of as being unique and stable throughout a person's life - indeed these characteristics are crucial in order to make any good biometric trait. New research, however, has been reported that questions just how stable an iris is over time, something that could affect the normally impressive performance of iris recognition systems on large populations.

An article in New Scientist reports that iris scans from a particular eye can alter over time, potentially meaning that a system will fail to match an iris if the template it matches against is very old.
The structures creating distinctive iris patterns are complete by the eighth month of gestation (although pigmentation continues into the first years after birth). However,  Kevin Bowyer at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana and his colleagues say they now have evidence that the Hamming distance increases over time for scans of the same eye.  Hamming distance is an important statistical measure - essentially if the Hamming distance is found to be below the decision threshold, then a positive identification is made. So if Hamming distance increases over time then there is an increased chance of false rejection by the system.
Bowyer and Co. initially compared pairs of scans of 26 irises taken two months apart with scans made four years apart. According to the report in New Scientist (based on recently submitted analysis) the team measured an increase of 0.018 per cent over the period.
So does this make a difference? Especially given the scale of some projects now under consideration, such as the UIDAI scheme in India. Probably not, it seems…
"Even if this finding is true, it is no cause for concern," says John Daugman of the University of Cambridge. He says a real-world system may have a false rejection rate of the order of 1 in 250 million, so the increase in Hamming distance measured by Bowyer would result in a false rejection rate of just 0.7 in 100 million scans after four years.
Subscribe to our free newsletter
Follow us on Twitter
Join us on LinkedIn

Article Comments

No reviews have been submitted

Please add a comment on this article from the Add Comment below.

Please Login or Register.

Login or Register

This article appears in :-

Could ageing eyes alter iris recognition?
Could ageing eyes alter iris recognition?
Share |

Sponsored Links

ievo Ievo™ readers are quickly representing the future of fingerprint access control by challenging your perception of biometrics. Unlike traditional security products Ievo readers perform even with substances present on the skin. Visit Ievo’s directory page to find out more!
Speed Identity Speed Identity is an innovative Swedish technology company supplying integrated biometric data capture solutions. The new Speed Capture G3 is the first cross-functional form factor.
3M Cogent 3M Cogent is a global biometric identification solutions provider to governments, law enforcement agencies, and commercial enterprises. 3M Cogent delivers the fastest, most accurate, and most sophisticated yet reliable biometric identification solutions in the world.
id3 Technologies Id3 Technologies is a biometrics expert company providing winning awards algorithms, biometrics devices and ID systems. Established since 1990 and originally involved in electronics, id3 is a biometrics veteran developing innovative, secure and convenient solutions like match on card, multimodal enrolment, AFIS and ABIS.